Name: Alfred Hitchcock Presents
Genre: Mystery, Drama, Crime
Released: 1955-10-02
Rating: 7.8
Cast: Alfred Hitchcock

tmdb76622195

@tmdb76622195

May 9, 20226/10

**The Best of Alfred Hitchcock Presents, Volume 1**: Alfred Hitchcock not only hosted his anthology series, he even directed a few episodes. The three episodes on this video were all directed by the master of suspense, but they do not live up to his better film work. The first episode, written by Roald Dahl, is entitled "Lamb to the Slaughter" (1958). Barbara Bel Geddes is a young, eager-to-please pregnant wife whose cop hubby comes home one night and springs a surprise. He is in love with someone else and wants a divorce. She goes about her wifely duties, trying to ignore the painful situation. He decides to leave, daring his wife to stop him. She does. Tom Ewell stars in "The Case of Mr. Pelham" (1955). He talks to a doctor at lunch, and tells him a peculiar story- it seems Pelham's been in a couple of different places around town. He snubs a local client while out of town. He does work in morning, then comes in to the office in the afternoon, not remembering the work. He leaves instructions with his butler, and does not remember them. Pelham reveals he did not do any of these things, blaming a double. The final story is a weak murder mystery called "Banquo's Chair" (1959). In 1903 England, retired inspector calls in a murder suspect who was never charged. He invites him to dinner on the two year anniversary of the suspect's aunt's murder and plants an actress in the other room to play the aunt's ghost so he can finally get his confession. Bel Geddes is very good in her role. The look on her face when her husband dumps her is heartbreaking. The problem is you know exactly what is going to happen through the finale. The premise really does not make much sense. Tom Ewell is very good in his role as the paranoid man with the double. He is very believable without going over the top. The final story has no real stars, just tried-and-true English character actors doing what they do best. It is not badly done, it is just done, with no challenge to the cast. Hitchcock's direction is nothing special. He does not have all the tricks at his disposal to make this any different than any other television director's work. He tries some stuff with "Banquo's Chair," but even the ghost sequence fails to spark anything. Accept for the second episode, the best sequence is Hitchcock's introduction and conclusions after the third episode. He talks about hunting in Hollywood, and the puns here are actually funny. Hitchcock's work has always been either really great ("Rear Window," "Rope," "Psycho") or very very not good ("Topaz," "Marnie"). This falls in the middle, but since one good episode cannot make up for two bad ones, I cannot recommend this collection.

GenerationofSwine

@GenerationofSwine

January 11, 202310/10

I guess the most powerful thing I can say is that I remember my family gathering around the television to watch this every week when I was a little kid. And it aired on when my father was 2 years-old. In other words it has lasting resonance, but that it because, like the original Twilight Zone (and to an extent the 80s reboot) it has a little bot of everything and a new story to tell every week. It's like what American Horror Story wants to be, but can't seem to wrap a story up in a single episode... or at least can't seem to do it well enough that guarantees that viewers will come back every week. It has a little of everything in a way that is runs the field from fun to scary depending on, well, depending on which episode you watch